PEPFAR's annual planning process is done either at the country (COP) or regional level (ROP).
PEPFAR's programs are implemented through implementing partners who apply for funding based on PEPFAR's published Requests for Applications.
Since 2010, PEPFAR COPs have grouped implementing partners according to an organizational type. We have retroactively applied these classifications to earlier years in the database as well.
Also called "Strategic Areas", these are general areas of HIV programming. Each program area has several corresponding budget codes.
Specific areas of HIV programming. Budget Codes are the lowest level of spending data available.
Expenditure Program Areas track general areas of PEPFAR expenditure.
Expenditure Sub-Program Areas track more specific PEPFAR expenditures.
Object classes provide highly specific ways that implementing partners are spending PEPFAR funds on programming.
Cross-cutting attributions are areas of PEPFAR programming that contribute across several program areas. They contain limited indicative information related to aspects such as human resources, health infrastructure, or key populations programming. However, they represent only a small proportion of the total funds that PEPFAR allocates through the COP process. Additionally, they have changed significantly over the years. As such, analysis and interpretation of these data should be approached carefully. Learn more
Beneficiary Expenditure data identify how PEPFAR programming is targeted at reaching different populations.
Sub-Beneficiary Expenditure data highlight more specific populations targeted for HIV prevention and treatment interventions.
PEPFAR sets targets using the Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) System - documentation for which can be found on PEPFAR's website at https://www.pepfar.gov/reports/guidance/. As with most data on this website, the targets here have been extracted from the COP documents. Targets are for the fiscal year following each COP year, such that selecting 2016 will access targets for FY2017. This feature is currently experimental and should be used for exploratory purposes only at present.
Since 2005, GFATM has provided to the DRC HIV program through the UNDP (the PR) $105,079,712 for
phases 1and 2 of the $113,646,453 of the approved Round 03 HIV budget 03. In addition, of the
$71,403,215 approved HIV round 07 grant, GF has signed with UNDP $22,675,188 in Phase 01 and has
disbursed $11,626,217 of this amount to UNDP already for program implementation. Recently, GF has
approved in Round 08 $234,540,691 HIV grant and $339,692,873 Malaria grant. The Malaria HIV round 8
phase 1 grant has been successfully signed by the PRs (UNDP, PSI and SANRU) with GF because of
several USG supported TAs to new civil society PRs (SANRU and CORDAID) to support the process of
grant signature and earlier implementation activities. A large number of sub-grants have been formalized
and are being implemented through partners countrywide. The implementation of these grants is really a
great challenge in DRC. Appropriate TAs are needed to CCM, PRs and Sub-recipients for better program
management and results achievements. USG has been working already to provide useful TA to the
GDRC. In addition to that, the USG has recruited a Global Fund Liaison who will be tasked with, among
other duties, the following: identifying opportunities to work side by side with government and other
counterparts including civil society to build capacity at all levels; participating in site visits, ensuring quality
implementation of activities and identification of program challenges; rapidly identifying potential
bottlenecks or problems and suggesting possible solutions; supporting proposal development and
transparency at all levels; and providing monitoring and evaluation support. The resources planned under
this activity will support the GL capacity to address the TA needs related to the management of GF
resources in DRC.
Since DRC has received more GF resources, USG team has strategically allocated REDACTED to
provide TA to support the GF activities implementation in DRC. In coordination with USG team, the GF
Liaison will closely work with the CCM and PRs to identify the areas that need TA, develop appropriate
scope of works, identify TA providers, and oversee the implementation of the TA funded activities.
